icons

Login / Sign up

Zero Brokerage.

Thousands of new listings daily.

100 Cr+ Brokerage saved monthly.

Change Phone
Get updates on WhatsApp

You're all set!

Get ready for regular updates and more.

Table of Contents

Quality Service Guarantee Or Painting Free

Unbeatable Price 5-Star Rated Partner! 2200+ Shades! Top Quality Paint Free Cancellation!

Get a rental agreement with doorstep delivery

Find the BEST deals and get unbelievable DISCOUNTS directly from builders!

5-Star rated painters, premium paints and services at the BEST PRICES!

Loved what you read? Share it with others!

thumbnail
Help us assist you better

Check Your Eligibility Instantly

Experience The NoBrokerHood Difference!

Set up a demo for the entire community

Thank You For Submitting The Form
Popup Top Image

Tenant Super Relax Plan

Enjoy Hassle-Free Renting

tick icon Full RM + FRM support
tick icon Instant alerts & premium filters
tick icon Rent negotiation & relocation help
Form submitted successfully!
Home Blog Real Estate Legal Guide & Laws Section 35 of Transfer of Property Act

What is Section 35 Of the Transfer Of Property Act: Doctrine of Election Meaning, Applicability and Importance in 2025

Published : September 24, 2025, 6:01 PM

Updated : November 27, 2025, 4:51 PM

Author : author_image Vivek

815 views
Summary
Section 35 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 introduces the Doctrine of Election, a principle ensuring equity in property transfers involving conflicting rights. If a transferor grants a property benefit they do not entirely own, the true owner must elect to accept the benefit and validate the transfer or reject it and retain ownership. This doctrine prevents unjust gain, protects the transferee’s interests, and upholds fairness in transactions. Professional legal support ensures accurate application and compliance.

Section 35 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, lays down the Doctrine of Election, a rule designed to ensure fairness in property dealings. It applies when a person transfers property they do not own but, within the same transaction, grants a benefit to the real owner. The rightful owner must then choose either to accept the benefit and approve the transfer or refuse the benefit and retain ownership. This principle prevents selective advantage and promotes equity in transactions.

Section 35 of the Indian Succession Act - Quick Info

This table provides a consolidated overview of the key aspects of Section 35 of the TPA, offering a quick reference for understanding its core function.

AspectDetails
SectionSection 35
ActThe Transfer of Property Act, 1882 [1]
SubjectThe Doctrine of Election [1]
PurposeTo enforce equity by requiring a person to choose between two inconsistent rights in a single transaction.
Filed ByNot an application; it is a legal principle applied to property transfer documents like Wills or Gift Deeds.
JurisdictionApplies to property transfers across India. [1]
Key RequirementA single transaction must both transfer the owner's property and confer a benefit upon the owner.

What is Section 35 of the Transfer of Property Act?

Section 35 of the Transfer of Property Act codifies the Doctrine of Election. The section states that a property owner cannot both approve and reject a single transaction. Suppose an instrument gives them a benefit but also attempts to transfer their own property to someone else. In that case, they can either accept the benefit and allow the property transfer or keep their property and give up the benefit.

Quality Service Guarantee Or Painting Free

Unbeatable Price 5-Star Rated Partner! 2200+ Shades! Top Quality Paint Free Cancellation!

Get a rental agreement with doorstep delivery

Find the BEST deals and get unbelievable DISCOUNTS directly from builders!

5-Star rated painters, premium paints and services at the BEST PRICES!

Key Aspects of the Section 35 Act

The doctrine is built on several key principles that ensure its fair and logical application in property law.

1. One Transaction, Two Rights

The doctrine is triggered only when a single instrument or transaction creates two conflicting rights. It must simultaneously attempt to transfer a person's property to a third party while also offering a benefit directly to that property owner.

2. Election is Mandatory

The property owner(legally obligatory) is legally required to make a choice. They cannot accept the benefit offered to them while simultaneously refusing to let their own property be transferred as part of the same deal.

3. Relinquishment of Benefit

If the owner dissents from the transfer (chooses to keep their own property), they must "relinquish" or give up the benefit that was offered to them in the same transaction. The benefit does not belong to them if they reject the condition attached to it.

4. Reversion of Benefit

When the owner relinquishes the benefit, it reverts to (goes back to) the person who made the transfer, or to their legal representatives if the transferor has passed away. It is treated as if the benefit was never given.

5. Responsibility to Disappointed Transferee

If the owner dissents, the person who was supposed to receive the owner's property (the "disappointed transferee") must be compensated. The relinquished benefit is used to make good their loss, up to the value of the property they were supposed to receive.

6. When is the Election Postponed?

Suppose the property owner is legally disabled (for example, a minor or a person of unsound mind). In that case, the duty to make the election is postponed until the disability ends or until a competent authority makes the election on their behalf.

7. What Constitutes an Election?

An election can be made expressly (by clear communication) or can be implied by the owner's actions. If the owner knowingly accepts the benefit for two years without expressing dissent, it is presumed that they have confirmed the transfer.

8. What is the Doctrine of Election?

The election under the Transfer of Property Act says that a person cannot "approbate and reprobate." This is a legal phrase that means you cannot accept one part of a single document or transaction that is beneficial to you, while simultaneously rejecting another part of the same document that is not. The doctrine forces a person to treat the instrument as a whole, either accepting it completely or rejecting it completely, thus ensuring fairness to all parties involved in the transaction. [2]

Elements of the Doctrine of Election under Section 35 of TPA

For the Doctrine of Election to apply, certain essential conditions must be met within the transaction.

  • Transfer of Property Not Owned: The person making the transfer (the transferor) must profess to transfer property that they do not have the right to transfer.
  • Benefit Conferred on the Owner: As part of the same transaction, the transferor must grant some benefit directly to the actual owner of the property.
  • Single Transaction: Both the transfer of the owner's property and the conferring of the benefit must be part of the same, single transaction.

Applicability of Section 35 of the Transfer of Property Act

The principles outlined in Section 35 of the Transfer of Property Act have a wide application across various laws and types of property.

  • Movable and Immovable Property: The doctrine applies to transfers of both movable and immovable property.
  • All Individuals: The principle applies to all individuals, regardless of their religion. It is a general principle of law that applies to Hindus, Muslims, Christians, and others.
  • Types of Instruments: It is most commonly seen in cases involving Wills, where a testator might bequeath their own property to one person while also bequeathing another person's property to someone else. It also applies to other instruments like Gift Deeds.

Importance of Section 35 in Property Law

Section 35 of the Property Law in India plays a crucial role in maintaining fairness and equity in complex property transactions.

  • It prevents a person from getting a benefit from a transaction while not fulfilling the obligation attached to it, which would be an unjust gain.
  • It protects the interests of the "disappointed transferee" by ensuring they are compensated if the owner chooses to keep their property.
  • The doctrine attempts to give effect to the transferor's overall intention as expressed in the legal document, as far as possible.
  • It forces a clear decision, either confirming or rejecting the entire transaction, which brings legal certainty and finality to the matter.

Judicial Interpretations of Section 35

Indian courts have consistently upheld the principles of Section 35, often referencing landmark case laws on Section 35 TPA. The foundational case is the English House of Lords decision in Cooper v. Cooper, which explained that a person who takes a benefit under an instrument must give full effect to that instrument. In the Indian context, cases have clarified that the doctrine applies only when a benefit is conferred directly on the property owner, not indirectly. [2]

Practical Implications of Section 35 in Real Estate

In practical real estate dealings, Section 35 is most relevant in the context of family settlements and Wills. For example, a father may write a Will leaving a fixed deposit to his son, but also giving a property that the son solely owns to his daughter. In this case, the son is put in a position of power. If he accepts the fixed deposit (the benefit), he must honour the transfer of his own property to his sister. This section ensures that such complex family arrangements are dealt with equitably.

How NoBroker Can Help with Legal Services?

Understanding complex legal principles, such as the Doctrine of Election in Section 35 of the Transfer of Property Act, is crucial when drafting or interpreting property documents, including wills and gift deeds. NoBroker's legal services can provide expert assistance in this area. Our team of experienced property lawyers can help you draft legally sound transfer documents and provide clear advice on the implications of each clause, ensuring your intentions are correctly recorded and legally enforceable.

Frequently Asked Questions?

Q1. What is Section 35 of the Transfer of Property Act?

Ans. It is a legal rule called the Doctrine of Election. It states that you cannot accept a benefit from a transaction while rejecting its obligation.

Q2. What does the doctrine of election mean under Section 35?

Ans. It means a property owner must choose ('elect') to either accept a benefit and confirm a related transfer of their property, or keep their property and refuse the benefit.

Q3. Can a beneficiary avoid an election under Section 35?

Ans. No, if the conditions of the section are met, the election is mandatory. The beneficiary cannot accept the benefit and also keep their original property.

Q4. What are some examples of the doctrine of election?

Ans. A common example is in a Will, where a person is given a cash gift but their own property is willed to another family member.

Q5. Why is Section 35 important in property law?

Ans. It ensures fairness in transactions by preventing a person from benefiting from an instrument while ignoring the attached conditions, thereby protecting all parties involved.

Loved what you read? Share it with others!

ARTICLE SOURCES
  1. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1330663/#:~:text=Where%20a%20person%20professes%20to,may%20in%20another%20dissent%20therefrom.
  2. https://www.drishtijudiciary.com/doctrines/transfer-of-property-act-doct/doctrine-of-election

Join the conversation!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get latest news delivered straight to you inbox

Recent blogs in

banner

Faster, better & smooth experience on the app

Exclusive app features

Real-time property alerts

Smart property suggestions

Continue on web